Earned Wage Access for QSRs: A Complete Guide

Introduction

It's Saturday night, peak dinner rush. Your phone buzzes with yet another callout. This time it's Quinn, one of your most reliable crew members. She's not sick. Her car broke down three days ago, and she doesn't have the $80 for the repair until Friday's paycheck arrives. She can't get to work, you're short-staffed during your busiest shift, and your other employees are stretched thin covering the gap.

‍

This scenario plays out thousands of times daily across quick-service restaurants (QSRs) in North America. It's not so much a performance issue or a scheduling problem as much as it's a financial access problem. And it's costing QSR operators like you in ways that don't always show up clearly on a P&L statement: lost shifts, turnover, training costs, overtime premiums, and customer service impacts when you're perpetually understaffed.

‍

Earned wage access (EWA) offers a solution. EWA allows employees to access wages they've already earned before their scheduled payday—without loans, interest, or predatory lending. For quick-service restaurants facing industry-leading turnover rates that averaged 144% in 2024, EWA has emerged as both a retention strategy and a competitive recruitment advantage.

‍

This guide will help franchise operators and QSR managers understand why earned wage access matters specifically for fast food workers, what to look for when evaluating EWA providers, and how the major players in the space—Tapcheck, DailyPay, Payactiv, Rain, and Zayzoon—compare for restaurant operations.

‍

Whether you operate a single franchise location or manage multiple units, you'll finish this guide with a clear framework for making an informed decision about implementing earned wage access in your operation.

Why Fast Food Workers Need Earned Wage Access

The Financial Reality of QSR Employees

The numbers tell a stark story. The median hourly wage for fast food workers in the United States hovers around $13-15 per hour, translating to roughly $27,000-31,000 annually for full-time employment. But here's the reality: most QSR employees aren't working full-time. They're piecing together 25-35 hours per week across variable schedules, making their actual annual earnings closer to $18,000-24,000.

‍

At these income levels, financial fragility isn't an edge case but rather the norm. According to the Federal Reserve's most recent data on household economics, approximately 37% of Americans would struggle to cover an unexpected $400 expense without borrowing or selling something. For QSR workers earning at or near minimum wage, this percentage climbs significantly higher.

‍

Consider the math from your employee's perspective. Rent or a room rental might consume $800-1,200 monthly. Add in transportation ($150-300), food ($250-400), a phone bill ($50-80), and basic utilities, and there's virtually no buffer for the unexpected. When a car repair, medical co-pay, or even a week of higher-than-usual gas prices hits between paychecks, your employees face impossible choices.

‍

Many turn to overdraft fees, which average nearly $20 per incident and can cascade if one overdraft triggers more fees as automated payments hit an empty account. Others use payday loans with effective APRs reaching 400% or higher. Some simply don't show up for shifts because they can't afford the gas to get there, choosing to preserve resources until payday rather than spend money they don't have to earn money they can't access yet.

‍

Here's what Quinn could be dealing with on a biweekly basis:

• Working 28 hours per week at $14.50/hour across four shifts
• Brings home roughly $350 per week after taxes, paid bi-weekly ($700 every two weeks)
• Week 1 of the pay cycle, Quinn's checking account looks manageable
• By Day 9, after rent, car insurance, and groceries, there's $43 in the account
• Day 10 brings an unexpected $60 medical bill

Quinn's options? She could skip a shift to avoid spending gas money she doesn't have, overdraft the account (triggering fees), borrow from a payday lender, or ask family for help.

‍

None of these options address the fundamental problem: Quinn has already earned $290 in wages over the past nine days that remain locked until Friday.

‍

This is the daily financial equation facing a significant portion of your workforce. And it directly impacts your operation's ability to maintain consistent staffing.

How EWA Solves Core Problems

Earned wage access fundamentally changes this equation by eliminating the arbitrary barrier between work performed and payment received. When your employees can access $50, $100, or more of their earned wages immediately, several cascading benefits emerge—for them and for your operation.

‍

Immediate need without predatory options: The most direct benefit is straightforward. When Quinn's $60 medical bill arrives on Day 9 of the pay cycle, EWA allows her to access $60 of the $290 she's already earned. She pays the bill, avoids overdraft fees, stays away from payday lenders, and shows up for her next shift because she can afford the gas. The financial emergency that would have derailed her week—and cost you coverage during a busy shift—gets resolved in minutes through a mobile app.

‍

The numbers here matter for your bottom line. When an employee calls out, you're not just down a person. You're paying overtime premiums to other workers who cover the shift, potentially compromising service speed and quality during rushes, and burning out your reliable employees who resent constantly filling gaps. Industry research suggests that each unexpected callout costs QSR operators between $200-400 when accounting for lost productivity, overtime, and service impacts. If EWA prevents even two callouts per month across a 15-person crew, you've likely covered the cost of the program.

‍

Retention impact through reduced financial stress: The connection between financial stress and job turnover is well-documented. When employees are constantly anxious about money, they're simultaneously more likely to leave for marginal pay increases elsewhere and less engaged while they're on your clock. The $0.50 more per hour that a competitor offers becomes irresistible when someone is desperate—even though switching jobs often means gaps in pay, new commutes, and uncertainty.

‍

EWA doesn't replace competitive wages, but it does change the calculus. Employees who feel they have financial flexibility and control are more likely to stay in a job they otherwise find acceptable. They're not scanning job boards during their shifts or jumping at the first opportunity that appears. Several QSR chains that have implemented EWA have reported turnover reductions as much as 50% in the year following implementation—a dramatic improvement in an industry where replacing an hourly worker costs an estimated $1,500-3,000 per position when factoring in recruiting, hiring, and training time.

‍

Recruitment advantage in a competitive market: The labor market for QSR workers has fundamentally shifted since 2020. Job seekers, particularly younger workers, now expect flexibility, digital-first experiences, and benefits that acknowledge their financial reality. When you're competing for talent against other restaurants, retail stores, and gig economy options, "access your pay daily" has become a meaningful differentiator.

‍

This messaging shows up on job postings, gets mentioned by hiring managers during interviews, and spreads through word-of-mouth among potential applicants. In markets where multiple QSR brands compete for the same labor pool, operators with EWA report faster time-to-fill for open positions. In practical terms, that means your peak seasons aren't hampered by understaffing because you can actually attract applicants when you need them.

‍

Performance benefits from engaged, focused employees: There's a less quantifiable but equally real benefit: employees who aren't constantly worried about money show up differently to work. They're more focused on customer interactions rather than mental math about whether they can afford dinner tonight. They're more willing to stay late when you're slammed because they know they can access those extra earnings immediately if needed. They're less likely to create drama or conflict with coworkers because financial stress—one of the primary drivers of interpersonal tension—is reduced.

‍

Several QSR operators report that customer satisfaction scores and speed-of-service metrics improved modestly after EWA implementation, though isolating EWA as the sole cause is difficult. What's clear is that financial wellness and workplace performance are connected, and tools that improve the former tend to benefit the latter.

The QSR-Specific Value Proposition

Earned wage access works across industries, but it's particularly valuable in quick-service restaurants for several structural reasons.

‍

High turnover industry context: QSR turnover rates consistently rank among the highest of any sector. The 144% average turnover rate means that, statistically, you replace your entire workforce roughly every 8-9 months. Some positions—entry-level crew members—see even higher churn, with turnover approaching 180-200% at some brands.

‍

This isn't primarily about pay, though compensation matters. It's about the intersection of demanding work, schedule unpredictability, limited upward mobility, and a workforce that often views these positions as temporary stepping stones. EWA can't solve all of these factors, but it addresses one of the primary reasons employees leave unexpectedly: financial emergencies that make continuing to work untenable in the short term. When an employee quits because they can't get to work until payday, that's a turnover event that EWA directly prevents.

‍

Younger, hourly workforce characteristics: The QSR workforce skews young. Roughly 70% of fast food workers are under 35, with a significant portion in the 18-24 age range. This demographic is particularly likely to lack financial cushions, have limited credit access, and face the financial instability that EWA addresses.

But younger workers also bring an expectation: they want digital, mobile-first solutions that work instantly. A benefit that requires paperwork, phone calls, or waiting periods won't gain adoption. EWA providers that offer intuitive apps with instant transfers align with how this workforce already manages their financial lives—through their phones, on demand, in real-time.

‍

Competitive hiring landscape: The pandemic permanently altered the QSR labor market. Workers who left hospitality during 2020-2021 often didn't return, creating a sustained labor shortage that persists into 2025. Simultaneously, options expanded: remote work, gig economy platforms, retail operations with better benefits, and even other QSR brands competing aggressively for the same candidates.

‍

In this environment, differentiation matters. When candidates are evaluating offers from three different fast-food chains plus an Amazon warehouse and DoorDash, the one offering earned wage access has a tangible advantage. This is especially true when you can articulate the benefit clearly: "You'll never wait two weeks for a paycheck again. Access your earnings daily, right from your phone."

‍

Mobile-first employee population: Your QSR employees are already living mobile-first lives. They're applying for jobs on their phones, managing their schedules through workforce management apps, and handling their finances through mobile banking and payment apps. EWA fits naturally into this ecosystem.

‍

This matters for adoption rates. Benefits that require employees to change their behavior or learn new systems often see low uptake. EWA leverages existing behaviors—checking your bank balance, transferring money, managing expenses—through familiar mobile interfaces.

‍

Key Considerations When Selecting an EWA Provider

Choosing an earned wage access provider isn't like selecting office supplies. It's a decision that will touch your payroll system, affect every employee, and directly impact your operational costs and retention metrics. The wrong choice means low adoption, hidden costs, implementation headaches, or worse: a failed rollout that burns credibility with your workforce and leaves you back at square one.

‍

The right choice, conversely, becomes invisible infrastructure that quietly solves problems. Employees use it seamlessly, it integrates cleanly with your existing systems, and you see measurable improvements in attendance and retention without ongoing administrative burden.

‍

This section breaks down the critical evaluation criteria for QSR operators. These are the specific questions that will determine whether an EWA provider works in your operation or creates new problems.

A. Cost Structure & Transparency

Here's the good news for QSR operators evaluating earned wage access: the major providers in this space—Tapcheck, DailyPay, Payactiv, Rain, and Zayzoon—all operate on employer-free models. You're not adding a per-employee line item to your monthly operating expenses. The platforms generate revenue by charging employees small transaction fees when they access their earned wages early.

‍

This employer-free model makes EWA an unusually low-risk benefit to implement. Unlike health insurance, 401(k) matching, or other traditional benefits that create fixed costs regardless of utilization, EWA costs you nothing directly. Your investment is primarily in implementation time and ongoing administrative coordination—not annual subscription checks to a vendor.

‍

That said, understanding the cost structure remains important for three reasons: it affects employee adoption rates, it shapes how you position the benefit, and it helps you evaluate whether the provider's business model is sustainable and ethical.

‍

How employee fee structures work: While the platforms are free to you as the employer, employees typically pay fees when they access their wages early. These fees generally fall into two categories:

‍

Transaction fees: Employees pay a small fee each time they transfer money, typically ranging from $1.99 to $4.99 per transaction depending on the transfer speed. Instant transfers (money arrives within minutes or hours) usually cost more than next-day transfers (money arrives the following business day via standard ACH).

‍

Subscription models: Some providers offer subscription options where employees pay a monthly fee (usually $5-15) for unlimited transfers or reduced per-transaction costs. This can be more economical for employees who use EWA frequently.

‍

The exact fee structure varies by provider, and some offer tiered options where employees can choose between free (slower) transfers and paid (instant) transfers. We'll detail each provider's specific pricing in the comparison section.

‍

Why this matters for your evaluation: Even though you're not paying these fees directly, they should factor into your provider selection for several reasons.

‍

Adoption implications: Higher fees can suppress adoption, particularly among the employees who need EWA most. Lower fees or free options for next-day transfers can drive higher utilization and therefore greater benefit realization.

‍

Equity and employee perception: Your employees will view this as a benefit you're providing, even though they're paying for it. If they feel the fees are excessive or unfair, that reflects on you as their employer. Conversely, if the fees are reasonable and transparent, it enhances the benefit's value. You want to be able to honestly tell your team: "This is a tool that helps you access your money when you need it, and the fees are fair and clear."

‍

Regulatory and ethical considerations: The EWA industry receives ongoing oversight from regulators and consumer protection advocates to ensure providers are compliant and transparent. Choosing providers with clear and reasonable fee structures reduces your reputational risk and ensures you're partnering with companies operating ethically. Providers charging excessive fees or using confusing fee structures may face future regulatory challenges that could disrupt your program.

‍

What to ask about employee costs: When evaluating providers, get complete clarity on what your employees will actually pay:

‍

"What exactly will my employees pay to use this service? Break it down:

• What's the cost for instant transfer?
• What's the cost for next-day transfer?
• Are there any free options?
• Are there subscription plans available, and what do they cost?
• Are there any other fees employees might encounter (inactivity fees, account fees, failed transaction fees)?"

Also ask: "What's your average transaction fee paid by employees in QSR operations similar to ours? What percentage of your QSR users choose instant vs. next-day transfers?"

‍

This gives you realistic expectations about what your employees will experience and helps you assess whether the fee structure will drive adoption or create barriers.

‍

Questions to ask every provider: Even in an employer-free model, ask for transparency on the complete picture:

‍

"Beyond the employee fees you've described:

• Are there ANY costs to me as the employer for implementation, integration, or ongoing platform access?
• If we need custom integration work, what does that cost and who performs it?
• What's the realistic time investment from my team during implementation and ongoing?
• Are there any scenarios where we would incur costs (e.g., employee separations with outstanding balances, failed ACH transactions, compliance issues)?"

If a provider hedges or can't clearly answer these questions, dig deeper. The employer-free model is genuine across major providers, but understanding the complete operational picture—including your team's time and any edge-case costs—ensures no surprises.

‍

The bottom line on costs: For QSR operators, the employer-free model of modern EWA providers removes the traditional barrier to implementing a meaningful retention benefit. You're not choosing between EWA and other budget priorities—you're choosing which EWA provider offers the best employee experience, easiest implementation, and most reliable partnership.

‍

The employee fee structure matters, but primarily as it affects adoption and employee satisfaction rather than your direct costs. Focus your evaluation on implementation ease, integration quality, employee experience, and provider reliability—factors that will determine whether this zero-cost-to-you benefit actually delivers the retention and recruitment value you're seeking.

B. Integration & Implementation

An EWA system is only as good as its ability to integrate smoothly with your existing technology stack. QSR operations run on specific systems for timekeeping, scheduling, payroll processing, and point-of-sale. Your EWA provider needs to plug into this ecosystem without creating manual workarounds, reconciliation headaches, or IT emergencies.

‍

Payroll system integration: Your payroll system—whether it's ADP Workforce Now, Paychex Flex, UKG, Paylocity, Gusto, or another platform—is where the actual reconciliation happens. On payday, the EWA provider needs to communicate with your payroll system to deduct accessed wages from employee paychecks.

‍

The sophistication of this integration varies wildly. Best-case scenario: fully automated bi-directional sync where hours worked flow to the EWA platform automatically and deductions flow back to payroll without manual file uploads or data entry. Worst-case scenario: you're downloading CSV files, manually uploading them to multiple systems, and reconciling discrepancies every pay period.

‍

Questions to ask:

• "How does the integration with [our specific payroll system] work technically?"
• "What manual steps will our payroll administrator need to perform each pay period?"
• "How do you handle corrections, adjustments, or discrepancies?"
• "If an employee separates from the company with an outstanding advance, how is that handled in our payroll system?"

If you're running payroll through your franchise system or corporate structure, add another layer: "Does your integration work within a franchise/franchisee relationship where corporate may handle payroll but we manage operations?"

‍

Time-to-launch—realistic implementation timelines: Provider sales teams will often promise quick implementations: "You can be live in two weeks!" The reality is usually more nuanced.

‍

A realistic implementation timeline for a QSR operation typically spans 4-8 weeks and includes:

• Week 1-2: Contracts signed, technical discovery calls, integration scoping
• Week 2-4: Integration development and testing (if not pre-built), data validation
• Week 4-6: Manager training, employee communication and onboarding preparation
• Week 6-8: Soft launch, troubleshooting, employee support ramp-up

Organizations with pre-built integrations to your specific payroll and POS systems can genuinely move faster—sometimes going live in 2-3 weeks. But if custom integration work is required, triple the timeline and expect hiccups.

‍

Ask: "What is the realistic timeline for a [number]-location QSR operation using [our specific systems] to go from contract signature to full launch with employee access? What are the critical path items that could delay this?"

‍

Also ask about their implementation support: "Who will be our point of contact during implementation? How many touchpoints should we expect? What happens if we encounter technical issues?"

‍

IT lift required—what your team needs to manage: Most QSR franchise operators don't have extensive IT departments. You might have a manager who "handles tech stuff" or you rely on corporate support or external IT consultants. Understanding the technical burden of an EWA implementation is critical.

‍

Key questions:

• "What IT resources or technical expertise do we need on our side for implementation?"
• "Will we need to provide API keys, database access, or system credentials? To whom?"
• "What ongoing technical maintenance will be required from our team?"
• "If something breaks—say, the data sync fails—who diagnoses and fixes it?"
• "Do you provide IT support directly, or will we need to coordinate between you and our other vendors?"

The best providers handle the technical heavy lifting themselves and provide simple dashboards for monitoring. The worst require you to become the intermediary between multiple technology vendors, troubleshooting integration failures you don't have the expertise to diagnose.

‍

Multi-location capability—for franchise operators with multiple units: If you operate multiple franchise locations, your EWA provider needs to handle this organizational complexity cleanly.

‍

Specific considerations:

• Can you manage multiple locations from a single administrative dashboard?
• Can you see adoption rates, usage patterns, and costs broken down by location?
• If locations have different payroll schedules or POS systems, can the provider accommodate this?
• Can you onboard locations sequentially (piloting at one location before rolling out to others)?
• How do employee transfers between your locations get handled in the system?
• If you have different managers or administrators at each location, can you set appropriate permission levels?

Some providers are built for enterprise multi-location operations. Others are designed for single-location businesses and bolt on multi-location functionality awkwardly. If you operate 3+ locations, make this a primary evaluation piece.

C. Employee Experience

Your employees are the end users of this system. If the app is confusing, slow, unreliable, or frustrating, adoption will be low and your investment will fail to deliver ROI. The employee experience needs to be genuinely excellent—not just "adequate"—because your workforce has alternatives (not using it at all, or advocating for a different provider).

‍

App usability—does it work for low-tech-literacy users? Your QSR workforce spans a wide range of ages, tech comfort levels, and smartphone familiarity. The EWA app needs to be intuitive enough that a 55-year-old who's uncomfortable with technology can use it successfully, while still feeling modern enough that a 19-year-old digital native doesn't find it clunky.

‍

Red flags in app usability:

• Multi-step verification processes that require email confirmations or security codes each time
• Unclear navigation where finding core functions (checking available balance, transferring money) requires exploring multiple screens
• Poor error messages that don't explain what went wrong or how to fix it
• Functionality that requires switching between the app and a website
• Apps that feel dated or have poor reviews in app stores

Green flags:

• Clean, simple interface with core functions accessible from the home screen
• Clear visibility of "available balance" (how much they can access right now)
• Simple transfer process: select amount, choose destination (bank account or debit card), confirm
• Helpful tooltips or tutorials for first-time users
• Strong ratings (4+ stars) in Apple App Store and Google Play Store with recent positive reviews

Ask providers: "Can I download and explore the employee app before committing? Can you walk me through the user experience from onboarding through first withdrawal?"

‍

Access speed—instant vs. next-day funding: When employees access their earned wages, how quickly does the money arrive? This varies significantly between providers and funding methods.

Typical options:

• Instant transfer (to debit card): Money arrives in minutes or within hours. Usually carries a fee ($1-5) even if the base service is free.
• Next-day transfer (to bank account via ACH): Money arrives the next business day. Often free or lower cost.
• Same-day ACH: Faster than standard ACH but not truly instant. May arrive later the same day.

For employees facing genuine financial emergencies, instant transfer is often essential—they need gas money right now, not tomorrow morning. But instant transfers typically cost more, either to you or to the employee.

Understand each provider's funding speed options and associated costs. Also ask about reliability: "What percentage of instant transfers successfully complete within the promised timeframe? What happens when a transfer fails or delays?"

‍

Access limits—how much can employees withdraw? EWA providers typically limit how much of earned wages employees can access before payday. These limits exist for risk management (ensuring employees can't access more than they've actually earned) and financial health (preventing employees from consistently accessing 100% of earnings and leaving nothing for payday).

‍

Common limit structures:

• Percentage-based: Employees can access 40-70% of earned wages before payday
• Dollar-based: Maximum of $100-500 per pay period
• Hybrid: Lesser of 50% earned or $200 per pay period

The limit structure affects the value proposition for employees. If your employees earn $400 in a pay period and the limit is 50%, they can access up to $200 early. If the limit is $100, that's their ceiling regardless of earnings.

‍

Ask: "What are your access limits? Can we adjust them based on our operational preferences? How do you calculate 'earned wages' (gross vs. net, tips included or excluded)?"

‍

Also understand the guardrails: "How do you prevent employees from consistently overdrawing and having minimal or zero take-home on payday? Do you provide financial health warnings or mandatory waiting periods?"

‍

Support availability—when your employee has an issue at 11 PM: Your employees work nights, weekends, and irregular hours. When they have an issue with the EWA app—login problems, failed transfers, confusion about their balance—they need help outside traditional business hours.

‍

Support availability breaks down into tiers:

• 24/7 phone and chat support: Employees can reach a human anytime
• 24/7 chat support, business hours phone: Always some help available, but immediate phone escalation limited
• Business hours only: Monday-Friday, 9 AM-5 PM support (often insufficient for QSR workforce)
• Email/ticket only: Submit issues and wait for responses (generally inadequate)

Ask providers: "What support channels do employees have access to? What are the hours? What's your average response time for urgent issues like failed transfers? Do you offer phone support or only chat/email?"

‍

Also ask about language support and whether support staff can actually resolve issues or just create tickets for back-office teams.

D. Compliance & Financial Health

Earned wage access exists in a complex regulatory landscape that's still evolving. The provider you choose needs to handle compliance rigorously to ensure the program operates ethically and sustainably.

‍

State-by-state regulations—EWA licensing requirements: EWA regulation varies significantly by state. Some states have passed specific legislation defining and regulating earned wage access. Others treat it under existing lending or money transmission laws. A few are currently developing frameworks.

‍

Your provider needs to be compliant in every state where you operate. This includes:

• Proper licensing (earned wage access licenses where required)
• Disclosure requirements (clear communication about fees and terms)
• Fee caps (some states limit or prohibit certain fees)
• Consumer protection compliance

Ask: "Are you licensed and compliant in [your specific states of operation]? Have you received any regulatory warnings or enforcement actions in any state? How do you stay current with evolving state regulations?"

‍

Tip handling—how tips are calculated in earned wages: If your QSR operation includes tipped positions (less common in fast food, more common in fast-casual), the treatment of tips in earned wage calculations becomes critical.

‍

Questions to address:

• Are tips included in the earned wage balance available for early access?
• How quickly do tips flow from the POS to the EWA platform?
• Are there different limits or fees for accessing tip income vs. hourly wages?
• How do you handle tip adjustments or chargebacks?
• Do you comply with tip credit and tip pooling regulations while providing EWA?

Even if your current operation doesn't involve tips, understanding a provider's tip-handling capabilities matters if you might add fast-casual concepts or different restaurant formats in the future.

‍

Financial literacy resources—does the provider offer education? The best EWA providers view themselves as partners in employee financial wellness, not just transaction facilitators. This means offering educational resources that help employees make smart financial decisions.

‍

Look for providers that offer:

• In-app financial education content (budgeting basics, saving strategies, debt management)
• Transfer insights and balance tracking
• Connections to other financial wellness resources

These features serve two purposes: they improve employee financial outcomes (which enhances the program's value), and they help prevent the misuse of EWA where employees consistently access 100% of earnings early and create a new cycle of financial stress.

‍

Ask: "What financial wellness resources do you provide beyond early wage access? How are these resources presented to employees? Do you track financial health outcomes?"

‍

Consumer protection considerations: Consumer protection laws create requirements around how financial products are offered, how data is used, and how consumers are protected.

‍

Reputable EWA providers should:

• Clearly disclose terms, fees, and conditions before employees enroll
• Protect employee financial and personal data rigorously
• Provide clear opt-out mechanisms
• Avoid deceptive or predatory practices

Ask: "How do you ensure data compliance? Do you report any information to credit bureaus? How is employee data protected and used?"

‍

Also ask about data ownership: "Who owns the employee usage data? How is it used? Can you sell or share employee data with third parties?"

‍

Ensuring it's true EWA, not disguised small-dollar lending: Here's a critical distinction. True earned wage access is not lending. Employees are accessing wages they have already earned through hours already worked. There's no interest, no credit check, no debt created.

‍

Some products marketed as "EWA" are actually small-dollar loans or wage advances that create debt obligations. These carry different legal implications and different risk profiles for both you and your employees.

‍

Verify with providers:

• "Is this true earned wage access based on hours already worked, or is this lending against future wages?"
• "Do employees undergo credit checks?"
• "If an employee leaves with an outstanding balance, what happens?" (In true EWA, some providers will absorb the cost; in lending, the debt may follow the employee and impact their credit.)
• "Are there any circumstances where employees would owe money beyond what they earned?"

This distinction matters practically (repayment cycles can cause extra employee stress) and ethically (true EWA is a fundamentally different product from payday lending alternatives and should not market themselves as such).

E. Scalability & Support

Your relationship with an EWA provider isn't just about the technology—it's about the ongoing partnership, support, and ability to grow together as your operation evolves.

‍

Franchise-friendly features—multi-location reporting and admin controls: Franchise operations have unique administrative needs. You likely want visibility across all your locations while possibly giving individual location managers some level of access or reporting.

‍

Look for:

• Consolidated dashboards showing metrics across all locations
• Drill-down capabilities to view individual location data
• Role-based access controls (corporate admin, location manager, payroll administrator)
• Reporting that helps you understand adoption, usage patterns, and ROI by location

Ask: "How does your platform accommodate franchise operations? Can I see system-wide metrics while also giving my location managers appropriate access? How do you handle our franchise relationship with [corporate entity] if applicable?"

‍

Onboarding support—employee education and adoption campaigns: Simply providing access to an EWA platform doesn't guarantee employees will use it. Successful implementations include structured onboarding and ongoing education.

‍

Strong providers offer:

• Customizable employee communication templates (emails, text messages, posters)
• Virtual launch events to introduce the benefit
• Manager training on how to explain and promote EWA to their teams
• Ongoing engagement campaigns to boost adoption among non-users
• Success metrics and benchmarking against similar operations

Ask: "What onboarding support do you provide? Do you offer on-site launch support? What materials can we use to communicate this benefit to employees? How do you help us drive adoption after the initial launch?"

‍

Also ask about their experience with QSR specifically: "How many QSR clients have you onboarded? What adoption rates do you typically see in restaurant operations? What best practices have you learned from other restaurant implementations?"

‍

Account management—white-glove vs. self-service: The level of ongoing account management varies dramatically between providers. Some assign dedicated account managers who check in regularly, proactively identify issues, and help optimize your program. Others operate self-service models where you access support only when you initiate contact.

‍

Neither model is inherently better—it depends on your preferences and internal capabilities. But you should know what you're getting.

‍

Questions to ask:

• "Will we have a dedicated account manager? How often will they check in with us?"
• "What does proactive account management look like—quarterly business reviews, optimization recommendations, adoption campaigns?"
• "If we encounter an issue, what's the escalation path?"
• "How do you handle contract renewals—automatic rollover or proactive re-engagement?"

For multi-location operators or those new to EWA, more hands-on account management often justifies a higher price point. For operators who prefer autonomy and have internal bandwidth, self-service models can work well.

‍

Analytics & reporting—what insights do you get on usage patterns? Beyond basic reporting (how many employees used it, how much was accessed), sophisticated EWA platforms provide insights that help you understand your workforce and optimize your operation.

‍

Valuable analytics include:

• Adoption rates over time and by location
• Usage frequency and average transaction size
• Correlation between EWA usage and attendance/retention (if trackable)
• Peak usage periods (which pay period days see highest access)

This data can inform workforce management decisions beyond EWA itself. For example, if you notice peak usage in the second week of your pay cycle, that might inform decisions about pay frequency or advance scheduling to help employees plan better.

‍

Ask: "What reporting and analytics do you provide? Can we export data for our own analysis? Do you offer any predictive insights or benchmarking against similar operations?"

‍

These five consideration categories—cost structure, integration, employee experience, compliance, and scalability—form the framework for evaluating any EWA provider. No provider will excel in every dimension, which means you'll need to prioritize based on what matters most to your specific operation.

‍

A single-location franchisee with a stable workforce might prioritize low cost and simple implementation over sophisticated multi-location reporting. A 10-location operator planning to expand to 20 locations might prioritize scalability and robust integrations over having the absolute lowest per-employee cost.

‍

The key is to ask these questions systematically with each provider you evaluate, document the answers, and make your decision based on comprehensive comparison rather than sales pitches or headline pricing.

In the next section, we'll apply this framework to compare the five major EWA providers commonly used in QSR operations: Tapcheck, DailyPay, Payactiv, Rain, and Zayzoon.

IV. Comparing Top EWA Providers for QSRs

Comparison Framework Introduction

The earned wage access market has matured significantly over the past few years, with several established providers competing for QSR operations. We evaluated five major EWA providers commonly used in restaurant operations: Tapcheck, DailyPay, Rain, Payactiv, and Zayzoon.

‍

This comparison focuses on features most relevant to franchise operators: balance calculation accuracy, transfer flexibility, funding models, integration breadth, and user experience as reflected in app ratings. All information reflects publicly available data and provider specifications as of November 2025. We encourage you to verify current offerings directly with providers, as features and integrations evolve.

‍

A note on objectivity: While this guide is published by Tapcheck, we've structured this comparison to present factual feature differences rather than subjective claims. Every QSR operation has unique needs, and the "best" provider depends on your specific systems, employee population, and operational priorities.

A. Tapcheck

Overview: Tapcheck is an earned wage access provider focused on accuracy and integration breadth. The platform is built around a deduction model that calculates available wages based on net pay, and offers unlimited transfer frequency—features designed to maximize employee flexibility and minimize financial stress.

‍

Key Features:

‍

Balance calculation model: Tapcheck uses a deduction model for calculating earned wages. This means the platform calculates available balance based on net pay (after taxes and deductions), giving employees a more accurate picture of what they'll actually receive. This approach reduces confusion on payday when employees see their paycheck after EWA deductions—the math is straightforward because it's based on the same net figure.

‍

Transfer frequency: Unlimited transfers throughout the pay period. Employees can access their earned wages as many times as needed without daily or per-pay-period caps. This flexibility is valuable for employees managing multiple small expenses rather than single large emergencies.

Funding model: Employees can access up to 70% of net pay before payday. This is among the higher access limits in the industry, providing meaningful financial flexibility while still ensuring employees receive a substantial paycheck on payday.

‍

Integration ecosystem: 300+ integrations with payroll systems, time and attendance platforms, and HR systems. This extensive integration library means Tapcheck can connect with virtually any technology stack a QSR operation might use, from major platforms like ADP and Paychex to specialized restaurant systems. The breadth of integrations reduces implementation friction and minimizes custom development needs.

‍

Employee experience: 4.8/5 app rating across iOS and Android platforms, reflecting strong user satisfaction with the interface, reliability, and functionality.

‍

Strengths for QSR:

• The deduction model's accuracy helps employees understand exactly what they're accessing, reducing confusion and support inquiries
• Unlimited transfers accommodate employees who need small, frequent access rather than large lump sums
• The 70% net pay limit provides substantial access while maintaining payday guardrails
• Extensive integrations mean compatibility with nearly any QSR tech stack, including niche or regional systems
• High app rating suggests reliable, user-friendly employee experience that drives adoption

Considerations:

• The net pay calculation model requires clean payroll data; operations with complex or inconsistent deductions may need to ensure data quality
• Higher access limits (70%) require stronger financial wellness guardrails to prevent employees from consistently overdrawing

B. DailyPay

Overview: DailyPay is one of the most established names in the earned wage access space, with significant market presence and a large customer base spanning multiple industries including hospitality and QSR. The company has focused heavily on partnerships and integrations with major employers.

‍

Key Features:

‍

Balance calculation model: DailyPay uses an intercept model for balance calculation. In this approach, DailyPay intercepts the full paycheck before payday and allows employees to draw from it, then delivers the remainder on payday. This is a different technical architecture than deduction models, with implications for how funds flow and how payroll reconciliation works.

‍

Transfer frequency: 5 transfers per day maximum. Employees can access their wages multiple times daily if needed, though there's a daily cap. This provides reasonable flexibility while preventing excessive micro-transactions.

‍

Funding model: Employees can access 50 to 70% of net pay before payday. The exact percentage may vary based on employer settings and employee history with the platform.

‍

Integration ecosystem: 180+ integrations with payroll and time tracking systems. DailyPay has built integrations with major enterprise platforms and many industry-specific systems, though the integration library is smaller than some competitors.

‍

Employee experience: 4.7/5 app rating, indicating strong user satisfaction with the platform's functionality and reliability.

‍

Strengths for QSR:

• Well-established brand with significant market presence may increase employee familiarity and trust
• Multiple daily transfers accommodate varying employee needs
• Strong app rating suggests reliable user experience
• Intercept model can simplify certain aspects of payroll reconciliation

Considerations:

• Fewer integrations than some competitors may require custom development for less common systems
• Daily transfer limits could be restrictive for employees managing multiple small expenses
• Intercept model architecture may require different payroll workflows than operators are accustomed to

C. Rain

Overview: Rain positions itself as a modern, employee-centric EWA provider with emphasis on clean user experience and straightforward functionality. The platform is built for simplicity, both for employees accessing wages and employers implementing the system.

‍

Key Features:

‍

Balance calculation model: Rain uses a deduction model, calculating available balance and then deducting accessed wages from the employee's paycheck on payday. This creates straightforward reconciliation and clear employee understanding of how EWA affects their paycheck.

‍

Transfer frequency: 3 transfers per pay period maximum. This is more restrictive than some competitors, limiting how frequently employees can access funds. The limitation is designed to encourage thoughtful use rather than impulsive micro-transactions.

‍

Funding model: Employees can access 50% of gross pay before payday. Note that this is calculated on gross (pre-tax) earnings, which means employees may access amounts closer to their net pay than the percentage suggests, depending on their tax and deduction situation.

‍

Integration ecosystem: 50+ integrations with payroll and timekeeping systems. Rain's integration library is focused on the most common platforms used across industries, with less breadth than some competitors but strong depth on major systems.

‍

Employee experience: 4.75/5 app rating, among the highest in the category. This suggests Rain has invested heavily in user experience, interface design, and app reliability.

‍

Strengths for QSR:

• Exceptionally high app rating indicates excellent user experience and interface quality
• Deduction model provides straightforward reconciliation
• Gross pay calculation may be simpler for operations without complex deduction structures
• Transfer limits encourage more intentional financial behavior

Considerations:

• Only 3 transfers per pay period is the most restrictive among providers, potentially frustrating employees who need more frequent access
• Smaller integration library may require custom work for less common systems
• 50% gross pay access may provide less actual funding than competitors offering higher net pay percentages

D. Payactiv

Overview:Payactiv takes a holistic approach to financial wellness, positioning EWA as one component of a broader suite of financial tools. Beyond wage access, the platform includes bill pay functionality, savings features, and financial counseling resources.

‍

Key Features:

‍

Balance calculation model: Payactiv uses a deduction model for earned wage calculation and payroll reconciliation, similar to Tapcheck and Rain. Accessed wages are deducted from the employee's paycheck on payday.

‍

Transfer frequency: Unlimited transfers throughout the pay period. Employees can access their earned wages as often as needed without daily or per-period restrictions.

‍

Funding model: Employees can access 50% of gross pay before payday. Like Rain, this is calculated on pre-tax earnings rather than net pay.

‍

Integration ecosystem: 70+ integrations with payroll, time tracking, and HR systems. This is a moderate integration library, covering major platforms but with less breadth than the most integration-heavy providers.

‍

Employee experience: 4.55/5 app rating, the lowest among the providers compared here, though still indicating generally positive user experience. The lower rating may reflect the app's broader functionality set (bill pay, savings, etc.) creating more complexity or more surface area for issues.

‍

Strengths for QSR:

• Unlimited transfers provide maximum flexibility for employees
• Holistic financial wellness approach may benefit employees beyond just wage access
• Additional features like bill pay and savings tools can improve overall financial health
• Deduction model provides straightforward reconciliation

Considerations:

• Lower app rating may indicate user experience challenges or greater app complexity
• 50% gross pay limit provides less access than higher-percentage competitors
• Moderate integration library may require custom work for some systems

E. Zayzoon

Overview: Zayzoon originated in Canada and has expanded throughout North America. The platform focuses on balance between employee access and financial responsibility, with guardrails designed to prevent overuse while still providing meaningful wage access.

‍

Key Features:

‍

Balance calculation model: Zayzoon uses a deduction model, with accessed wages deducted from employee paychecks on payday through standard payroll reconciliation.

‍

Transfer frequency: 1 transfer per day maximum. This is the most restrictive transfer frequency among the providers compared, designed to encourage employees to request what they need once rather than making multiple small transactions.

‍

Funding model: Employees can access 30-70% of net pay before payday. The range suggests flexibility based on employer preferences or employee history, though the lower bound (30%) is more conservative than some competitors.

‍

Integration ecosystem: 130+ integrations with payroll and time tracking systems. This is a solid integration library covering major platforms and many industry-specific systems.

‍

Employee experience: 4.85/5 app rating, the highest among all providers compared. This exceptional rating suggests Zayzoon has invested heavily in app quality, reliability, and user experience.

‍

Strengths for QSR:

• Highest app rating indicates exceptional user experience and reliability
• One-transfer-per-day limit encourages thoughtful usage and simplifies reconciliation
• Net pay calculation provides accuracy about what employees actually receive
• Good integration library covers most common QSR systems
• Variable funding model (30-70%) allows customization based on employer preferences

Considerations:

• One transfer per day is the most restrictive frequency, potentially frustrating employees who need multiple small withdrawals
• Lower funding minimum (30%) may be too conservative for some operations, though the range allows adjustment
• Smaller integration library than the most integration-heavy providers

‍

Key Takeaways from the Comparison:

‍

Balance calculation: Most providers (Tapcheck, Rain, Payactiv, Zayzoon) use deduction models, while DailyPay uses an intercept model. Deduction models are generally more straightforward for payroll administrators familiar with standard deduction processing.

‍

Transfer flexibility: Tapcheck and Payactiv offer unlimited transfers, providing maximum employee flexibility. Zayzoon (1/day), Rain (3/pay period), and DailyPay (5/day) impose limits that encourage more intentional usage but may frustrate employees needing frequent small withdrawals.

‍

Funding amounts: Tapcheck offers the highest access at 70% of net pay. DailyPay and Zayzoon offer variable ranges up to 70% net. Rain and Payactiv cap at 50% but calculate on gross pay rather than net, which may result in different actual available amounts depending on individual tax and deduction situations.

‍

Integration breadth: Tapcheck leads significantly with 300+ integrations, followed by DailyPay (180+), Zayzoon (130+), Payactiv (70+), and Rain (50+). For operators using less common or specialized systems, integration availability may be a decisive factor.

‍

User experience: App ratings are consistently strong across all providers (4.55-4.85 range), with Zayzoon slightly leading at 4.85/5 and Payactiv slightly trailing at 4.55/5. All ratings indicate generally positive user experiences.

‍

V. Making Your Decision: A Framework

You've now seen the landscape: why EWA matters for QSR operations, what to evaluate when choosing a provider, and how the major players compare. This section gives you a systematic approach to choosing the right EWA provider for your specific operation.

A. Assess Your Specific Needs

Before scheduling demos or requesting proposals, get clear on what you're actually trying to solve and what constraints you're working within.

‍

Critical Questions to Answer:

‍

Technology infrastructure:

• What payroll system do you use? (ADP, Paychex, UKG, Gusto, other?)
• What POS system? (Toast, Square, NCR, Clover, other?)
• What time and attendance system, if separate from POS?

Operational scope:

• How many locations do you operate?
• Total employee count across all locations?
• Do all locations use the same systems, or is there variation?

Primary concerns:

• What's your current annual turnover rate?
• How comfortable is your payroll administrator with new technology?
• Do you need visibility into which employees are using EWA and how frequently?

Write down your answers. They form your requirements document that will guide every conversation with potential providers.

B. The Three Core Decision Factors

For QSR operators, three factors matter most when selecting an EWA provider:

‍

1. Integration capabilities with your existing systems

‍

This is non-negotiable. If the EWA provider can't integrate smoothly with your payroll and timekeeping systems, everything else becomes irrelevant. You'll face manual data entry, reconciliation errors, and payroll headaches every pay period.

‍

Verify that potential providers have native, pre-built integrations with your specific systems—not "we can build a custom integration" promises. Custom integrations mean delays, costs, and ongoing maintenance issues.

‍

Create a simple checklist:

• Payroll system integration: Native/Custom/None
• Time tracking integration: Native/Custom/None
• Multi-location support: Yes/No

Any provider without native integrations to your core systems should be eliminated unless you have dedicated IT resources and appetite for complexity.

‍

2. Clean payroll reconciliation that doesn't create problems

‍

On payday, the EWA provider needs to communicate seamlessly with your payroll system to deduct accessed wages from employee paychecks. The best systems make this completely precise and error-free.

‍

Ask providers specifically:

• "Walk me through the payroll reconciliation process with our [specific payroll system]."
• "What manual steps will our payroll administrator need to perform each pay period?"
• "What happens when there are discrepancies or errors?"
• "If an employee leaves with an outstanding balance, how is that handled?"

‍

3. Administrative visibility and controls

‍

You need a clear dashboard showing:

• How many employees have registered and are actively using EWA
• Usage patterns (frequency, amounts, trends by location)
• Which employees are accessing wages most frequently

Most importantly, you need the ability to manage access for individual employees. If an employee is consistently accessing 100% of their earned wages before payday and creating financial problems for themselves, you should be able to:

• See this pattern in your dashboard
• Temporarily restrict or adjust their access limits
• Require a cooling-off period before re-enabling full access

Ask providers:

• "Show me the administrative dashboard. What visibility do I have into usage?"
• "Can I adjust access limits or temporarily disable access for specific employees?"
• "Can I generate reports by location, time period, or employee segment?"
• "What controls do I have to prevent overuse?"

For multi-location operators, also verify: "Can I see system-wide metrics while drilling down into individual location data? Can location managers have limited dashboard access?"

C. The Evaluation Process

Step 1: Shortlist based on integrations

‍

Start by eliminating providers that can't integrate with your core systems. Only proceed with providers offering native integrations to your payroll and timekeeping platforms.

‍

Step 2: Request demos focused on your systems

‍

Provide each shortlisted provider with your specific scenario: "We operate [X] locations with [Y] employees using [payroll system] and [POS system]. Show us exactly how integration works, how payroll reconciliation happens, and what our administrator will do each pay period."

‍

During demos, focus on:

• Can they demonstrate the actual integration with your systems?
• How does payroll reconciliation work in practice?
• What does the administrative dashboard show?
• What controls exist for managing employee access?

Step 3: Check references from similar operations

‍

Ask: "Can you connect me with 2-3 QSR or franchise operators using your platform with our same payroll system?"

‍

Talk to them about:

• Implementation experience
• Ongoing payroll reconciliation
• Administrative burden
• Employee adoption and satisfaction
• Any unexpected issues

Step 4: Pilot if possible

‍

If you operate multiple locations, pilot at one location for 60-90 days. This validates that integrations work as promised with your actual data and identifies any implementation issues before they affect your entire operation.

‍

Set clear success criteria:

• Zero payroll reconciliation errors
• 60%+ employee adoption within 60 days
• Positive employee feedback
• Clean administrative visibility and reporting

D. Implementation and Rollout

Communication and Training

‍

Successful EWA launches require clear, repeated communication to both managers and employees.

‍

Manager preparation (one week before launch): Brief all managers on what EWA is, why you're offering it, how it works, and how to answer basic questions. Provide them with:

• One-page quick reference guide
• FAQ document with 10-15 common questions
• Direct contact for provider support
• Simple talking points for announcing to employees

Employee rollout (launch week): Use multiple channels to announce and explain:

• Email/text with clear subject line and signup link
• Posters in break rooms with QR codes
• Brief announcements during pre-shift meetings
• On-site or virtual demo sessions where employees can sign up with support

Follow-up (weeks 2-4): Remind non-adopters about the benefit through additional messages, manager encouragement, and success stories from early users (with permission).

‍

The key: make it easy to understand and easy to sign up. Some employees respond to digital communication; others need in-person explanation. Use all channels.

‍

Success Metrics

‍

Track these metrics monthly in your first six months:

‍

Adoption:

• Percentage registered (target: 60-70% by month 2)
• Percentage actively using (target: 50-60% by month 3)

Operational impact:

• Unexpected callouts per month (before vs. after)
• Turnover rate (6 months post vs. 6 months prior)
• Time-to-fill for open positions

Administration:

• Time spent on payroll reconciliation per pay period
• Support tickets or integration issues
• Manager feedback on ease of management

Employee experience:

• App ratings and reviews
• Survey results
• Usage patterns (frequency, amounts, peak days)

Create a simple dashboard tracking these metrics monthly. If adoption lags or issues arise, diagnose and address quickly rather than letting problems persist.

VI. Conclusion

The math is straightforward: turnover costs QSR operators $1,500-3,000 per employee. In an industry with 144% average annual turnover, a 50-employee operation loses approximately $100,000-200,000 yearly to recruiting, hiring, and training replacement workers. If earned wage access reduces turnover by even 15-20%—a conservative estimate based on industry implementations—the benefit pays for itself many times over.

‍

And since major EWA providers charge employers nothing, the ROI calculation is almost absurdly favorable.

But EWA isn't just about the math. It's about acknowledging a fundamental reality: your employees have already earned their wages, yet arbitrary payment cycles prevent them from accessing that money when they need it most. The car breaks down on Tuesday, but payday isn't until Friday. The choice between paying for the repair or missing shifts shouldn't exist—but without EWA, it does.

‍

For franchise operators and QSR managers, offering earned wage access signals something important to your workforce: you understand their financial reality and you're willing to provide tools that actually help. In a competitive labor market where potential employees are comparing your operation to competitors across the street, to warehouse jobs, to gig economy platforms, this matters.

‍

"Access your pay daily" is concrete, immediate, and valuable in ways that vague promises about "opportunity" or "flexibility" are not.

The Strategic Imperative

The question isn't whether financial stress affects your employees—it demonstrably does. The question isn't whether EWA addresses that stress—the data shows it does. The real question is: which provider best fits your specific operation?

‍

This guide has given you the framework to answer that question:

‍

You understand why it matters. Financial instability drives callouts, turnover, and disengagement. EWA directly addresses the root cause, improving retention and recruitment while costing you nothing directly.

‍

You know what to evaluate. Integration capabilities, payroll reconciliation quality, and administrative visibility are the core factors that determine whether your EWA implementation succeeds or creates new problems.

‍

You can compare your options. Tapcheck, DailyPay, Rain, Payactiv, and Zayzoon each have strengths in different dimensions. Tapcheck leads in integration breadth (300+) and funding access (70% of net pay) with unlimited transfers. DailyPay offers an intercept model and strong market presence. Rain emphasizes exceptional user experience (4.75 app rating). Payactiv provides holistic financial wellness tools beyond wage access. Zayzoon delivers the highest app rating (4.85) with conservative usage guardrails.

‍

You have a decision framework. Assess your needs, shortlist by integration compatibility, demo with your specific use case, check references, pilot if possible, and implement with systematic communication and training.

No One-Size-Fits-All

There is no universally "best" EWA provider any more than there's a universally "best" POS system or payroll platform. The right choice depends on your specific circumstances:

• Single-location operators using common systems might prioritize simplicity and user experience over extensive integrations
• Multi-location franchisees need robust reporting, administrative controls, and scalability
• Operations with complex payroll structures benefit from net pay accuracy and strong integration support
• Operators concerned about overuse need clear visibility and individual employee controls

Match the provider's strengths to your priorities, not to abstract notions of "best."

The Competitive Advantage

Here's what many QSR operators miss: you're not competing only on wages. You're competing on total value proposition, and that includes benefits, flexibility, respect, and workplace culture. In markets where $15/hour is standard across five different QSR brands, how do you differentiate?

‍

Earned wage access is one answer. It's concrete, it's immediately useful, it costs you nothing, and it's still uncommon enough in many markets that offering it sets you apart. The franchise operator who implements EWA while competitors are still talking about it gains a tangible recruitment advantage and retention buffer.

‍

This advantage is temporary. EWA is moving from "innovative" to "expected" as more operators adopt it. But for now, in many markets, it remains a meaningful differentiator. Early adopters benefit most.

A Final Word

Your employees show up every day, work hard in demanding conditions, and earn their wages through that work. When those wages remain inaccessible until an arbitrary payday while rent, car repairs, and grocery bills don't wait, you create unnecessary stress that ripples through your operation in the form of callouts, turnover, and disengagement.

‍

Earned wage access removes that unnecessary barrier. It's not revolutionary—it's simply logical. Your employees have earned the money; helping them access it when they need it is both compassionate and good business.

‍

The providers exist. The technology works. The cost to you is zero. The ROI is clear.

‍

The only remaining question is: which provider is right for your operation?

‍

You now have the information to answer that question confidently. Go implement it.

‍

Ready to get started with Tapcheck? Visit tapcheck.com or contact our QSR solutions team to schedule a demo customized for your franchise operation. See firsthand how 300+ integrations, 70% net pay access, and unlimited transfers can work in your restaurants.

‍